Carl Sagan

the embedder is the problem smartass, i use direct link every time and the app steals my link and formats in some ugly way when i just want the image at its source size

you guys can add a clamps button but not (img)(/img) tags?
or webms that play auto muted? you guys need to set your priorities straight and trust the community a little more than nothing. 

you guys can add a clamps button but not (img)(/img) tags?
or webms that play auto muted? you guys need to set your priorities straight and trust the community a little more than nothing. 

i have yet to die to another player besides my boy Chris.
 
oh yeah and rip Tristan i didn't raid you i just looted :^).
 
 

Aiite, I know you're working on it and it just launched today, but here's my biggest complaint about the forum layout now -- it's too fucking big.  Unnecessarily so.  There's too much space between everything.  Here are some comparison shots, and some specifics on what changed that could be changed.
 
1)  Chatbox is fucking huge.
Old: 5 lines, 220 pixel height.  Icons are shrunk down from their standard size, and everything displays on 1 line by default if it fits ICON-NAME-MESSAGE.  YOU CAN MINIMIZE IT.
New: 6 lines, 420 pixel height.  Icons are shrunk slightly, but bigger than they need to be.  Messages display on 2 lines by default. YOU CAN'T MINIMIZE IT.
 
2)  Announcements -- I don't have an example, but they're one thin bar in the old version, and this one has a mini post that you guys set not to be dismissable with a lot of empty, white space above and below the actual announcement.
 
3) Sidebar items -- I can dismiss them all in the old forums, in these forums, you cannot.  They apparently also show up inside of threads now (did they before?), and just suck up space that could be used (again) for the actual content of the thread.  This screenshot is 1250 pixels wide, text only displayed in 700 pixels.  Appears to be slightly less of an issue on the Brave theme, because the left sidebar is removed which adds about 300 pixels for thread content.
 
4) Size of each subforum
Old: 75 pixels, description on mouseover, .  Newest post split into 2 lines (title:::Date,Poster), 40 pixels.
New: 115 pixels, description has its own special place below links to the actual subforum, .  Newest post split into 3 lines (title:::Poster:::Date), 55 pixels.
 
5) Child forums
Old:  If the listed child forums could fit on one line, they would all be listed on one line.  100 pixels for this vs....
New: Child forums are split into 2 columns, the font is bigger, and the space between each line is bigger.  320 pixels for this.
 
6)  I don't know how to describe this... definition? Organization?
 
Old:  The links, shoutbox, and announcements made up the "top" of the forums.  They spanned across the entire top of the page.  The list of subforums and all the side modules appeared underneath them, and it gave a little bit better definition (in my opinion) to the forums, and made the shoutbox more prominent, but differentiated it from the forums below.  I don't have to scroll down an entire page to see the forums or a post that I'm reading.
New:  The shoutbox blends with the forums, the sidebars take up space that could be used for the shoutbox and announcements so they aren't quite as long.  I have to scroll down an entire page length to get to the forums or a post I clicked on.
 
 
I'm bored of this now, but I'm sure I'll edit when I notice more shit.
 
 
Edit:  I can't ninja edit shit any more to make people look dumb.  Move that to complaint #1.
 

im not saying that spoilers should go unpunished
 
just set the punishment in stone so people a) know full well when they are breaking the rules and what they should expect and b) arent getting ridiculously long bans because a staff member took it personally or is using the rule as an excuse to ban someone for their vendetta
 
also, id rather have free discussion on the most popular movie of the year instead of extended censorship on the chance someone hasn't seen the movie. on the forums its easy to tag spoilers but it gets complicated in-game and on teamspeak. Ive heard from a couple sources that after a week its fine but i doubt this was deliberated on by all staff and im pretty sure chosen just pulled it out of his ass (again)
 
ned stark dies, dont ban me ctark

no one has ever been banned for the hairy nippon rule

if you seriously believe you should be able to censor people on the internet because your feelings are hurt you can go suck a dick (literally)

I understand his frustration, he was banned for a bullshit reason that literally is not in our rules
don't be so hard on someone who isnt apart of our clique just because they are pissed at not being able to play on our servers for an entire week
The ban was far too long considering this rule DOES NOT EXIST. He was trying to talk about the biggest movie of the year on a very social server and because someone was banned for spoilers in the past he gets a WEEK ban.
 
I posted something similar in the thread and it was removed within 10 minutes. we need more community input and less stuck up admins- this isnt a professional organization its a gaming clan ffs

this game rn

im having trouble keeping up with these kids and their dated me mes
worse than hackers imo

he just wanted to make some friends why you guys gotta be so mean

if you seriously believe you should be able to censor people on the internet because your feelings are hurt you can go suck a dick (literally)

no one has ever been banned for the hairy nippon rule

see you in 6 months

wait a second did you see that
 

 
 

 
this explains everything 
 

shut the fuck up rune u small son dumpster living mongoloid

I think this guy just tried reporting theinternet for hurting his feelings

lmao this thread is so gay

no one has ever been banned for the hairy nippon rule

if you seriously believe you should be able to censor people on the internet because your feelings are hurt you can go suck a dick (literally)

http://8ch.net/b/src/1446049635298.webm

no one has ever been banned for the hairy nippon rule