Sean

white knight btw  
 i like hovering underage girls online
 i like to have proper punctuation to appear smarter on a gamer forum 
 dont even talk to me my iq is 280  

white knight btw  
 i like hovering underage girls online
 i like to have proper punctuation to appear smarter on a gamer forum 
 dont even talk to me my iq is 280  

white knight btw  
 i like hovering underage girls online
 i like to have proper punctuation to appear smarter on a gamer forum 
 dont even talk to me my iq is 280  

white knight btw  
 i like hovering underage girls online
 i like to have proper punctuation to appear smarter on a gamer forum 
 dont even talk to me my iq is 280  

pretty sure you can get your dad in trouble for mentioning your dad works for the NSA. 
 
But I doubt he even works for the NSA, he would teach his daughter to not be a complete fucking retard.

Wow man I just down repped you because you could've handled this way better. You sounded super triggered over something that doesn't concern you, no need to get pissy about it.
 
Autocorrect got me lol
@Cman

Maybe they are still talking about it because of how wrong you are.
 
First, you don't need special equipment to carry out a DoS. DoS attacks can be done several ways. I think the way you are thinking is to have a very fast internet connection and saturate a servers connection by shear bandwidth. Usually pure bandwidth attacks are DDoS which is distributed and using a botnet(multiple spread out computers/servers usually infected). However, there are other ways for single machine to do a DoS which involve vulnerabilities in software or hardware. The only equipment you need is a computer and internet line.
 
Second, we are not unprotected. Our host provider has very fast connections to handle bandwidth saturation by DDoS and also has network hardware appliances to filter out other types of attacks and attempt to block some DDoS coming in so it doesn't reach the servers. The reason we picked this host is because of that protection. We don't need some white knight admin constantly on the server waiting to defend the server from the evil script kiddie. We have(or our host has) a big ol'e box with a bunch of wires connected to it and Arbor Networks written on it.
 
Third, I have no idea why you think not having an admin on would make someone want to commence an attack. Normal attacks come from pissed off children with mommy and daddies credit card that got banned from the server or they are trolls wanting to show off their e-peen... either way they WANT an ADMIN on. They want to show off or get back so an admin needs to be there. On the flip-side when servers get attacked randomly and there happens to be no admins on I can guarantee they don't give a shit if an admin is on or not. They are either a rival community trying to take down a competitor or they are just attacking the top servers on the browser list. The later is what's prominent in not just gmod but any online games. There are people that look at the most amount of players and go after those server regardless of admins being on or not.
 
So before you go running your mouth how we are unprotected why don't you do some actual research... or at least realize there are people in this community who are not children and have more knowledge then you because they work in industries that have to deal with such attacks on a much bigger scale then a gaming community with game servers.

eh most people don't understand that everything i say is usually a joke. my life is a meme, so everything i say is a meme. I understand why it does sound hostile, but really, i'm not trying to be. That's just how i sound when i talk, and i'm sincerely sorry for the disrespect, lot. 
 
And yes, Krony, Sith, and Funky are the only so's i've seen on for a good amount of time and do their jobs without being so strict and giving people the benefit of the doubt. Which i do understand why it can be hard to do, but it seems to be the best option for running a server. Keeps peace. 
 
I dont get why you're gunna sit here and act like this gmod server is protected from getting dosed, considering my experience when it comes to computers and the information i could achieve means that someone who even had a bit more of skill than i do, could really fuck up the server. Yeah not having an admin on will really change that, but still. Either way this server isn't protected whatsoever. 
 
i also dont get why we need to talk about this anymore. Can we just leave it at what it is instead of talking about it on other threads? That would be the adult thing to do. 

I read it just fine. I back Sweds decisions 100% until I'm given reason not to. Back your bullshit up with some actual proof and maybe then I'll consider taking you seriously. 

You seem overly infatuated with sticks being put into asses. I don't know what happened, but I hope whoever made you like this was served some sort of justice for putting branches near your rectum. 

YO DAWG, CHECK IT LIKE THIS DAWG, I TYPE LIKE I TALK AND I TALK LIKE I NEED FOOD STAMPS DAWG. 

Why are you talking like this?

"Yo so they always all got sticks up they asses?"   "I mean, check it like this:"

Or install tapatalk and don't be a pleb

Or install tapatalk and don't be a pleb

Or install tapatalk and don't be a pleb

Or install tapatalk and don't be a pleb

This should probably be in FFA, good thing the link doesn't work any more!

These players are banned from future tournaments due to no-shows or just general trolling:
 
Wall - STEAM_0:1:54336457 - Complete No-show with no notice
Buster - STEAM_0:0:32526894 - Complete No-show with no notice
DESOUSA - STEAM_0:0:142577262 - Complete No-show with no notice during group stage, and trolled during bracket stage with zeus and chat msgs
ventus - STEAM_0:1:54822065 - rage quit during 1st match and never came back
consider windex - STEAM_0:1:122490309 - Complete No-show with no notice
 
 

who said I was ever gone

Cya dude, TMS isn't for everyone.

Thos eyes tho

Just so you know, because reading may be hard for you, this thread is in spam. So buy a gym membership and make a life choice you vape weezing ass clown.

Ignorantia juris non excusat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (February 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Ignorantia juris non excusat[1] or ignorantia legis neminem excusat[2] (Latin for "ignorance of the law excuses not"[1] and "ignorance of law excuses no one"[2] respectively) is a legal principle holding that a person who is unaware of a law may not escape liability for violating that law merely because one was unaware of its content.
European-law countries with a tradition of Roman law may also use an expression from Aristotle translated into Latin: nemo censetur ignorare legem (nobody is thought to be ignorant of the law) or ignorantia iuris nocet (not knowing the law is harmful).
Contents
  [hide] 
1Explanation
2Translation
3Into law
4See also
5References
Explanation[edit]
See also: Promulgation and Promulgation (canon law)
The rationale of the doctrine is that if ignorance were an excuse, a person charged with criminal offenses or a subject of a civil lawsuit would merely claim that one was unaware of the law in question to avoid liability, even if that person really does know what the law in question is. Thus, the law imputes knowledge of all laws to all persons within the jurisdiction no matter how transiently. Even though it would be impossible, even for someone with substantial legal training, to be aware of every law in operation in every aspect of a state's activities, this is the price paid to ensure that willful blindness cannot become the basis of exculpation. Thus, it is well settled that persons engaged in any undertakings outside what is common for a normal person, such as running a nuclear power plant, will make themselves aware of the laws necessary to engage in that undertaking. If they do not, they cannot complain if they incur liability.
The doctrine assumes that the law in question has been properly promulgated—published and distributed, for example, by being printed in a government gazette, made available over the internet, or printed in volumes available for sale to the public at affordable prices. In the ancient phrase of Gratian, Leges instituuntur cum promulgantur ("Laws are instituted when they are promulgated").[3] In order that a law obtain the binding force which is proper to a law, it must be applied to the men who have to be ruled by it. Such application is made by their being given notice by promulgation. A law can only bind when it is reasonably possible for those to whom it applies may acquire knowledge of it in order to observe it, even if actual knowledge of the law is absent for a particular individual. A secret law is no law at all.
In the criminal law, although ignorance may not clear a defendant of guilt, it can be a consideration in sentencing, particularly where the law is unclear or the defendant sought advice from law enforcement or regulatory officials. For example, in one Canadian case, a person was charged with being in possession of gambling devices after they had been advised by customs officials that it was legal to import such devices into Canada.[4] Although the defendant was convicted, the sentence was an absolute discharge.
In addition, there were, particularly in the days before satellite communication and cellular phones, persons who could genuinely be ignorant of the law due to distance or isolation. For example, in a case in British Columbia, a pair of hunters were acquitted of game offenses where the law was changed during the period they were in the wilderness hunting.[citation needed] In reaching this decision, the court refused to follow an early English law case in which a seaman on a clipper before the invention of radio was convicted even though the law had been changed while he was at sea (Bailey (1800) Russ & Ry 1).
An alternate explanation of the origin of the maxim, though not particularly relevant to the modern context, can be found with the philosophy of the Greeks and Romans. These were cultures heavily influenced by customary legal systems. Within such a system, law is learned as a person participates in the culture and customs of the community. Thus it is unreasonable to believe a person could have avoided learning them. These rules and customs were also interwoven with ethical and religious dialog so that laws expressed what is right and good and deviation that which is not. We find that Cicero wrote the following in De re publica (On the Republic):
"There is a true law, right reason, agreeable to nature, known to all men, constant and eternal, which calls to duty by its precepts, deters from evil by its prohibition. This law cannot be departed from without guilt. Nor is there one law at Rome and another at Athens, one thing now and another afterward; but the same law, unchanging and eternal, binds all races of man and all times."
Plato wrote similarly in Minos:
"What’s right is right and what’s wrong is wrong. And isn’t this believed by everyone ... even among the Persians, and always? ... What is fine, no doubt, is everywhere legislated as fine, and what is shameful as shameful; but not the shameful as fine or the fine as shameful."

Europe? More like Eunope.

ahaha, Canadians love to mention how their money is nearly equal in value to ours. And I love saying how I can buy a house in Canada for $13 and change.
Try running on something higher than 1280x720.