Dr. NarwhalsNumbNuts IV

2 hours ago, vexer said:

Honestly @Sean we should do a Disney Movie night I don’t care what anyone says but disney movies are great. Moana is also extremely good HeiHei reminds me of @Dr. NarwhalsNumbNuts IV I can make a list of classic Disney movies everyone needs to watch atleast once in their life.

im okay with this, he's argubly the most important character that connects all of the other arcs

Hercules or GTFO. It's the only 2D animation Disney movie that matters

24 minutes ago, Gerald said:

Slovakian coal miner shortly after having to abandon his post due to a cave collapse, colorized, 1967

I miss the ball, white supremacist look you had

Now it's just Generic German Soldier 3 for your credits mention

play with the resolution that youre playing on. Sometimes that can be the cause of in game menus acting up

sic

certified idiot sandwich 

To be fair, how is this any different from custom TTT? We got that up and running after years of bitching for it. The server's been dead for about a week now. And we all have Garry's Mod... Our playerbase would greater be reduced on BF2

3 hours ago, krony said:

Asked and you get it. Now with just no charge. people literally flew to other side of map and die or flew from ground to sky and well.. die

 

I think newton is kinda too powerful. way too powerful right now. need some bit adjust on it.

I disagree. The newton launcher has a solid cooldown between shots, so i think it's balanced it. 

Punch o meter does not recharge fast enough. You wait half the round for it to recharge fully and its pretty shit. Im not suggesting proptown levels of punch, but a faster, harder recharge would be nice 

Just now, ZachPL said:

Yeah those are default settings, it can be changed easily.

 

EDIT: do we want to make the knife 1 hit kill?

Yes. Also also, the new weapons pack? There are a few guns that don't spawn in naturally in maps, or their respective ammo drops do not spawn either. 

also, also, also, lots of the new T/D weapons are missing icons or textures. It's booty cheeks, looking at the shuriken with purple and black checkerboard patterns

Just now, ZachPL said:

 

I think i can fix the sensivitity of the awp and silienced sniper, if you try the regular sniper it should be better. They updated the scope code since the servers ere last up so I just have to copy over some code hopefully.

Yeah, the normal sniper seems to be just fine. Also, Newton Launcher does not have enough power to send people flying. It's more like a little bump than anything. Even at full charge

awp scoped in sensitivity is horrible. its hard to control

Snipers in general do not hit where the crosshair is located. I dont know whats causing this, but i can be aiming at a still head and miss with a clear shot. Something doesn't seem right 

Just now, Shaymin said:

 

This is a Christian community, please no swearing, my mom checks my roblox account every ten minutes.

Quit while you're behind.

6 minutes ago, SpartanSakaro said:

I am late to the party but this is all i want to say.

Leave it to a woman to tell a 10+ year old community how to properly run itself, am i right @Dad?

 

Weren't you paying attention? Her dad is Gabe Gates, founder of MicroValve, stop fucking around or you'll get hacked!!

Just now, Shaymin said:

 

This is like a 25 minute + read...

 

The fuck you eatin Narwhals?

I mean, as long as your mother didn't drink and shoot up during the pregnancy, I'd like to think that this could be read in a good 10 minutes

Well this was a great read for my nightly shit, thank you everyone

Just now, Yunki said:

well fuck you too

 

 

btw still support my CT on narwhals in this incident because he said on his mic out loud "Oh it sorted it unevenly? not my problem" He knew there was an unfair advantage for the Ts and still carried out the game. Bad warden!!!!

 

Listen here, you punk ass paidmin piece of shit, don't you ever fuck with me again. You scum come up in here acting like you run this bitch just because you used mommy's credit card?!??

Just now, Beerman said:

...is this racism? 

Actually, reading this twat's complaint then the posts here, this is an artist's rendition of what he looks like in real life 

Now this was some shitposting

39 minutes ago, ThatOllieWhoDies said:

Post a picture of yourself and if you're better looking than the people you're roasting then sure

Man, it's not about attractiveness. There are roasts to be had on ugly and beautiful people alike lmao

I've posted before doe, I don't think I'll offend anyone too much 

Can I start roasting people or just keep quiet

Just now, Noah said:

I know I look 5

that's my habibi

@TotesMagoats your best buddy ole pal turtle's back in the CD! Asking to be unbanned! 

I INSIST YOU GIVE THE PEOPLE WHAT THEY WANT AND MAKE HIM CRY

2 hours ago, Swed said:

Just so you know, because reading may be hard for you, this thread is in spam. So buy a gym membership and make a life choice you vape weezing ass clown.

It doesn't change the fact that you're a condescending cuck

4 hours ago, Swed said:

Ignorantia juris non excusat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (February 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Ignorantia juris non excusat[1] or ignorantia legis neminem excusat[2] (Latin for "ignorance of the law excuses not"[1] and "ignorance of law excuses no one"[2] respectively) is a legal principle holding that a person who is unaware of a law may not escape liability for violating that law merely because one was unaware of its content.

European-law countries with a tradition of Roman law may also use an expression from Aristotle translated into Latin: nemo censetur ignorare legem (nobody is thought to be ignorant of the law) or ignorantia iuris nocet (not knowing the law is harmful).

Contents

  [hide] 

1Explanation

2Translation

3Into law

4See also

5References

Explanation[edit]

See also: Promulgation and Promulgation (canon law)

The rationale of the doctrine is that if ignorance were an excuse, a person charged with criminal offenses or a subject of a civil lawsuit would merely claim that one was unaware of the law in question to avoid liability, even if that person really does know what the law in question is. Thus, the law imputes knowledge of all laws to all persons within the jurisdiction no matter how transiently. Even though it would be impossible, even for someone with substantial legal training, to be aware of every law in operation in every aspect of a state's activities, this is the price paid to ensure that willful blindness cannot become the basis of exculpation. Thus, it is well settled that persons engaged in any undertakings outside what is common for a normal person, such as running a nuclear power plant, will make themselves aware of the laws necessary to engage in that undertaking. If they do not, they cannot complain if they incur liability.

The doctrine assumes that the law in question has been properly promulgated—published and distributed, for example, by being printed in a government gazette, made available over the internet, or printed in volumes available for sale to the public at affordable prices. In the ancient phrase of Gratian, Leges instituuntur cum promulgantur ("Laws are instituted when they are promulgated").[3] In order that a law obtain the binding force which is proper to a law, it must be applied to the men who have to be ruled by it. Such application is made by their being given notice by promulgation. A law can only bind when it is reasonably possible for those to whom it applies may acquire knowledge of it in order to observe it, even if actual knowledge of the law is absent for a particular individual. A secret law is no law at all.

In the criminal law, although ignorance may not clear a defendant of guilt, it can be a consideration in sentencing, particularly where the law is unclear or the defendant sought advice from law enforcement or regulatory officials. For example, in one Canadian case, a person was charged with being in possession of gambling devices after they had been advised by customs officials that it was legal to import such devices into Canada.[4] Although the defendant was convicted, the sentence was an absolute discharge.

In addition, there were, particularly in the days before satellite communication and cellular phones, persons who could genuinely be ignorant of the law due to distance or isolation. For example, in a case in British Columbia, a pair of hunters were acquitted of game offenses where the law was changed during the period they were in the wilderness hunting.[citation needed] In reaching this decision, the court refused to follow an early English law case in which a seaman on a clipper before the invention of radio was convicted even though the law had been changed while he was at sea (Bailey (1800) Russ & Ry 1).

An alternate explanation of the origin of the maxim, though not particularly relevant to the modern context, can be found with the philosophy of the Greeks and Romans. These were cultures heavily influenced by customary legal systems. Within such a system, law is learned as a person participates in the culture and customs of the community. Thus it is unreasonable to believe a person could have avoided learning them. These rules and customs were also interwoven with ethical and religious dialog so that laws expressed what is right and good and deviation that which is not. We find that Cicero wrote the following in De re publica (On the Republic):

"There is a true law, right reason, agreeable to nature, known to all men, constant and eternal, which calls to duty by its precepts, deters from evil by its prohibition. This law cannot be departed from without guilt. Nor is there one law at Rome and another at Athens, one thing now and another afterward; but the same law, unchanging and eternal, binds all races of man and all times."

Plato wrote similarly in Minos:

"What’s right is right and what’s wrong is wrong. And isn’t this believed by everyone ... even among the Persians, and always? ... What is fine, no doubt, is everywhere legislated as fine, and what is shameful as shameful; but not the shameful as fine or the fine as shameful."

By God, you're a condescending faggot

Shovl, rules are rules. Sometimes there's a little wiggle room, but negligence is not a valid excuse. Just take the L for now and come back in October. 

Just now, DMODW said:

it'll probably be worth stealing online.

Don't give it that much credit it now

2 hours ago, XCapn said:

There's really no arguing with you guys, there's no point. It's not idiotic to mute the voice chat, I do it because no one will shut up and you're all still loud as heck. People ignore the text all the time, so I don't need to explain that one. The claiming a room rule is not at all essential and the game would be fine without it, if a round's moving slow and the traitors won't ever approach you, go out and find them, get killed, another round will start very shortly. I know you won't change it and I know you're just going to mock me or not explain why I'm wrong but I don't care, this is one of the only servers with the rules and every other server works just fine

console 

"volume 1" change to "volume 0.6"