Iherdcows 3419 Posted June 3, 2017 Wanted to give people enough time to vote in the first one. Same rules as before. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Don Juan 679 Posted June 3, 2017 I believe 6 is a round and healthy number for rounds per map. Is it 9 now? I think that if we change it to 6 and people think its too little we can fall back to 8 more easily rather than going from 10-9-8 and then to 6 at a later point? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fps_trucka 1715 Posted June 3, 2017 Just a little heads up people first round is usually incredibly fast so we will only really have x-1 full rounds. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Booch 257 Posted June 3, 2017 I think a lot of people don't like the maps or the new guys don't know the names of the good ones. So the shit one becomes the map and depops the server really fast Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trav 6834 Posted June 3, 2017 14 hours ago, Booch said: I think a lot of people don't like the maps or the new guys don't know the names of the good ones. So the shit one becomes the map and depops the server really fast People can RTV if they want to. I think having maps change quicker is better to keep people sticking around. Personally I think 6 is healthy. If we're looking at testing shit out, lets go to 6 and see how the server handles it or what people think. Then if people think its too fast of a map change, we can fall back to 8, like @Don Juan said. It seems like a really simple fix by just changing one command in the server. I don't see why we should just try out something shorter and change it back if need be. @Iherdcows can you please make the vote public? As well anything happening with the other vote? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Iherdcows 3419 Posted June 3, 2017 If you're looking to see who voted for what, thats not happening. I tested in incognito mode and saw that the winning result could be seen. The other vote, keeping no detour no delays won, however it'll probably still be removed. The point of it, other than adding another way for terrorist to rebel, was to act as a barrier to new cts, and the ones that were willing to learn the rules would stay. We arent getting many new players, which is why It'll probably be removed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trav 6834 Posted June 3, 2017 Just now, Iherdcows said: If you're looking to see who voted for what, thats not happening. How come? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tazmanianxdude 360 Posted June 3, 2017 11 minutes ago, Travesty said: How come? Because the vote could be biased, some people might just vote on the one others are voting for. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trav 6834 Posted June 3, 2017 1 minute ago, tazmanianxdude said: Because the vote could be biased, some people might just vote on the one others are voting for. Lol if you wanted to remove that you wouldn't be able to tell how many people voted for what. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Revöker 656 Posted June 9, 2017 On 6/4/2017 at 5:44 AM, Iherdcows said: If you're looking to see who voted for what, thats not happening. I tested in incognito mode and saw that the winning result could be seen. The other vote, keeping no detour no delays won, however it'll probably still be removed. The point of it, other than adding another way for terrorist to rebel, was to act as a barrier to new cts, and the ones that were willing to learn the rules would stay. We arent getting many new players, which is why It'll probably be removed. Interesting point, there used to be too many new players that would clog up CT and make people leave because they sucked. And about the vote thing, you can always see what the winning vote is before you vote. So I don't see what you're getting at about seeing who voted for what. Since this isn't opinions about other people (which tend to skew opinions so they don't hurt other's feelings) I don't see any good reason to not let it be public since doing so should provide more discussion. But to the matter of the rounds. I think 8 is a good compromise for now, 6 is too short and would cause new players to leave because they'd have to download a shit ton more maps making their wait time that much longer. And older players will get more refreshing maps more often than 10 rounds. I also tried to check out what other servers were running with and they vary quite a lot, I saw rounds of 6 to 30 as well as a shitty single map server. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trav 6834 Posted June 9, 2017 While I agree 8 is a good compromise, I don't think it will do anything to change our population. Changing it to 6 and seeing how it goes seems like a better route if we want to see change. If it's too quick, it can be changed to 8. If fastdl is working as intended, it doesn't take that long to download a new map. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Booch 257 Posted June 9, 2017 Maybe instead of round based make it time based on a map and there is a final round when time runs out Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
