New map for war 3? maybe?

[MisterTurkes 544]

saw this on the front page of the workshop. idk if too small but i really just want it for nostalgia factor.

 

its a halo battle creek remake for cs go

http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=316698677&searchtext=

 

lemme know what you engineers and admins think.

[Knox 1470]

it's really small

[skitt 1307]

i'm totally down for this map. i dont understand why the sG wcs/wc3 community has been against fy maps. 

[MrCoolness 547]

Try it out, loved this map in halo.

 

 

 

Edit:

 

err but it might be small for a war3 mod.

[BLiNDBoi 930]

Oh wow, I even remember this map and I wasn't into multiplayer for halo.

[turbulance 105]

Every map in war3 needs objectives. or we have 2 KJ's flying around for 3 minutes while the rest of us wait some for a few invisible pistols. Skitt we have been here before

[skitt 1307]

well, the whole waiting around for 2 KJs to end a round thing only happens because of the general atmosphere of the server, I believe. if alltalk/deadtalk wasn't on, ppl would pay quite a bit more attention to the game they are playing. 1vs1 KJ is unbearable on large maps(hangemhigh), but on smaller fy maps, it really isn't bad at all. As long as the 2 players are not fucking retarded and know how to use a radar. I agree with you about not having an objective can be obnoxious on some maps, but on smaller fy maps(maps we don't even fucking have on the server) I believe there wouldn't be much of an increase in round length. Maybe this map is a bit too large/complex for our server's needs, considering it is an fy map. However, I don't think you(shin) or anyone else should rule out non-objective maps. 

[turbulance 105]

"As long as the 2 players are not fucking retarded and know how to use a radar. " aaaaaaand that's where you lost me

[fontaine 1744]

too small