thorgot 2420 Posted September 3, 2013 Nothing high, but I was thinking something around 0.5-1 seconds cooldown after successfully bashing someone. Guns like the negev, which fire much faster than any gun in CS:S ever did, shoot at such a ridiculous rate that races like infected will be frozen until they're dead. With this slight change, most gun battles won't be affected, but spraying point blank at high hp races will be nerfed a bit. I'm talking about all races which freeze other races by shooting them, not just Human. Thoughts? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
n2fwa 605 Posted September 3, 2013 A .5 - 1 second cooldown wouldn't effect much to be honest, but it does need a nerf in some way. If you are a good player, all you need is one bash and it's a kill. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bink 42 Posted September 3, 2013 A .5 - 1 second cooldown wouldn't effect much to be honest, but it does need a nerf in some way. If you are a good player, all you need is one bash and it's a kill.that's true, even more so if they're shooting at something like infected, they can spray at it bashing them, get out of range by teleporting/running/lj and start spraying away again Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fat Black Woman 257 Posted September 3, 2013 for the love of god yes Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thorgot 2420 Posted September 3, 2013 Should it be longer, then? 2 seconds? 5 seconds? It could also vary per race. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BLiNDBoi 930 Posted September 3, 2013 Please do this, its something that makes sense in a way. If done I will allow glockness monster to be created. That race was retarded op for prema bashing a zombie. Lets go with a rule of time duration * 2 so cooldown protection, what you guys think about that? 1 second = 2 seconds of cooldown after the bash duration 1 water.exe reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bink 42 Posted September 3, 2013 Would like to test it out to see how it goes Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Matty 889 Posted September 3, 2013 2-3 second cd would prob work. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
B-cock #1 641 Posted September 3, 2013 Can it be CD on player instead of on attacker? So if 2 bash races were attacking, then the bashes wouldn't stack or proc right after one another. Also, maybe easier to code? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ika 320 Posted September 4, 2013 Someone once suggested possibly coding bash proc based on firing rate of the gun. Seems like it would take a lot of coding for individual guns, but is that possible? That wouldn't be a bad solution, and the code could be re-used for other types of procs. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BLiNDBoi 930 Posted September 4, 2013 Why should the fire rate of a gun matter? The duration of the freeze is the cause of the problems when you think about it. 1 second, even pistols can fire more than one bullet in a second. Some shotguns could but you are mostly dead if you get hit by one anyway. I like my duration bash time * 2 for cool down time idea Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
twochainzz 24 Posted September 4, 2013 Bash doesnt look OP at all, people should learn RUN. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bink 42 Posted September 4, 2013 you can't run if you've already been bashed. also twochainzz I CAN"T UNSEE WHAT I JUST SEEN ON YOUR SIGNATURE Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrCoolness 547 Posted September 4, 2013 I'm against this personally... Nothin wrong with the way bash works right now 1 Wintergreen reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BLiNDBoi 930 Posted September 4, 2013 Number one thing that is complained about that not realistically a big problem, true. But damn if you dare put glockness into the server, I'll hunt you down man. lol Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ika 320 Posted September 5, 2013 I'm against this personally... Nothin wrong with the way bash works right now holy shit I thought you died Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Name 2616 Posted September 5, 2013 holy shit I thought you diedhe is now a ghost whore rip in peace coolness Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BLiNDBoi 930 Posted September 5, 2013 rest in peace in peace, damnit name. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Name 2616 Posted September 5, 2013 rest in peace in peace, damnit name.you should put your PIN number into an ATM machine to get some money to buy pills for your obsessive compulsive OCD Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr_Oob 25 Posted September 5, 2013 Coolness if for bash spam who would have thought :V? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BLiNDBoi 930 Posted September 5, 2013 you should put your PIN number into an ATM machine to get some money to buy pills for your obsessive compulsive OCDIt was your fail and besides its like the 3rd time I've seen it within a week. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TurtleFrenzy 2612 Posted September 5, 2013 />It was your fail and besides its like the 3rd time I've seen it within a week.#that'sisthejoke Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JodoGoD 14 Posted September 5, 2013 agreed, 2-3 seconds cooldown would be awsome. and yea a cooldown on the person its self like b-cock said would be a little smarter. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr_Oob 25 Posted September 5, 2013 agreed, 2-3 seconds cooldown would be awsome. and yea a cooldown on the person its self like b-cock said would be a little smarter. +1 if no one knew yet how lame I think bash and blind spam is ... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Undercover Cop 5 Posted September 8, 2013 This would be so great. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites