LOPEZ 1750 Posted December 2, 2010 Hey Junzou, while these guys talk about muscle, let's talk about food. Pop tarts..hmm.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skotti 2105 Posted December 2, 2010 5'8"13019.8When I did this in Health class I got a 7.4.... Show how accurate this is.EDIT: Could of been 7.4% body fat. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
UnknownLegend 5480 Posted December 2, 2010 Hey Junzou, while these guys talk about muscle, let's talk about food. Pop tarts..hmm....So hungry right now, didn't have time to eat lunch before class and now I'm running participants in the lab ;_;I could really go for a Juicy Blucy right now... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zachmanman 877 Posted December 2, 2010 5'8"13019.8When I did this in Health class I got a 7.4.... Show how accurate this is.... to get a 7.4 you would have to be like 55lbs Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LOPEZ 1750 Posted December 2, 2010 So hungry right now, didn't have time to eat lunch before class and now I'm running participants in the lab ;_;I could really go for a Juicy Blucy right now...I had Dinner already, but oh boy...I could go for some fucking Hot Wings right now. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dojima 7619 Posted December 2, 2010 well, the water tank doesn't measure Body Mass Index, it measures % body fatScientifically speaking, it seems like it ought to be able to do both. BMI is just a fancy term for body density...one-dimensional body density, though.Oh, and Illogical, you're gay. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LOPEZ 1750 Posted December 2, 2010 Scientifically speaking, it seems like it ought to be able to do both. BMI is just a fancy term for body density...one-dimensional body density, though.Oh, and Illogical, you're gay.You know why I have respect for you? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Konah 0 Posted December 2, 2010 I can deadlift 500, come at me broDeadlifting, when you have proper form, has nothing to do with your erector spinae. EDIT: the only role they should be playng is stabilization, otherwise they are compensating for weak hamstrings and glutes, which could fuck up your lumbar spine.I'd be curious to see what postural distortions you have, my money is on upper-cross syndrome and a posteriorly tilted pelvis. Just saiyan.Come at me bro. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dojima 7619 Posted December 2, 2010 You know why I have respect for you?Why? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
UnknownLegend 5480 Posted December 2, 2010 Why?Because you're awesome. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LOPEZ 1750 Posted December 2, 2010 Why?You have proper grammar. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Super Novacaine 2228 Posted December 2, 2010 5'11", 155lb21.6Yep. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Fohacidal Posted December 2, 2010 5'11", 155lb21.6Yep.skinny giant at 21.6 wat? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sooners 342 Posted December 3, 2010 6'1 - 175lbBMI of 23.7....apparantly I'm on the fringe of being overweight.---------- Post added at 06:10 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:08 PM ----------I had Dinner already, but oh boy...I could go for some fucking Hot Wings right now.Holy shit those look tasty. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mitch 2111 Posted December 3, 2010 hurrrr. 26.1 bmibut i have like 15% body fat D: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
blob 1985 Posted December 3, 2010 skinny giant at 21.6 wat?5'11" is giant?Or did i misread. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zachmanman 877 Posted December 3, 2010 Scientifically speaking, it seems like it ought to be able to do both. BMI is just a fancy term for body density...one-dimensional body density, though.Oh, and Illogical, you're gay. its a body mass index, so no it wontall it measures is the amount of weight per inch of height you have, roughlyanyone could be 5'5" 200lbs and 5% bf or 5'5" 200lbs and 45% bf, it figures in none of thisto measure bf you have to use indirect methods of measurement which are normally inaccurate, the only way to directly test is to throw your body in a giant blender and put it on puree, then extract the fat and weigh itDeadlifting, when you have proper form, has nothing to do with your erector spinae. EDIT: the only role they should be playng is stabilization, otherwise they are compensating for weak hamstrings and glutes, which could fuck up your lumbar spine.I'd be curious to see what postural distortions you have, my money is on upper-cross syndrome and a posteriorly tilted pelvis. Just saiyan.Come at me bro.depending on what form you use, if you are a sumo deadlifter then you would be correctbut if you are a conventional deadlifter you use your erector spinae in the top portion of the lift, otherwise you'll never hit a full lockout, and don't make me post pictures of my hamstrings, my ass is also quite huge, I have amazing postureand you can't say your erector spinae have nothing to do with deadlifting, go and do a heavy ass deadlift session even with your perfect form, and the next day tell me your lower back isn't sorenow u come at me Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Konah 0 Posted December 3, 2010 its a body mass index, so no it wontall it measures is the amount of weight per inch of height you have, roughlyanyone could be 5'5" 200lbs and 5% bf or 5'5" 200lbs and 45% bf, it figures in none of thisto measure bf you have to use indirect methods of measurement which are normally inaccurate, the only way to directly test is to throw your body in a giant blender and put it on puree, then extract the fat and weigh itdepending on what form you use, if you are a sumo deadlifter then you would be correctbut if you are a conventional deadlifter you use your erector spinae in the top portion of the lift, otherwise you'll never hit a full lockout, and don't make me post pictures of my hamstrings, my ass is also quite huge, I have amazing postureand you can't say your erector spinae have nothing to do with deadlifting, go and do a heavy ass deadlift session even with your perfect form, and the next day tell me your lower back isn't sorenow u come at meYour lower back should be isometrically contracting the entire time, bearing the weightload, that is why it gets sore. During the lock-out your pelvis should be thrust forward due to hamstrings contracting not a concentric erector spinae contraction - that's how you blow out your back. And I'm not just talking sumo deadlifts, but romanian and straightleg as well. Upper-cross has nothing to do with your hamstrings. In any exercise, form > weight, or you develop altered length-tension relationships and improper firing patterns - which would results in excessive use of the erector spinae group in the final phase of the deadlift to reach lockout Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zachmanman 877 Posted December 3, 2010 Your lower back should be isometrically contracting the entire time, bearing the weightload, that is why it gets sore. During the lock-out your pelvis should be thrust forward due to hamstrings contracting not a concentric erector spinae contraction - that's how you blow out your back. And I'm not just talking sumo deadlifts, but romanian and straightleg as well. Upper-cross has nothing to do with your hamstrings. In any exercise, form > weight, or you develop altered length-tension relationships and improper firing patterns - which would results in excessive use of the erector spinae group in the final phase of the deadlift to reach lockout anyone who sits around focusing on form their entire lifting career, ends up being 155lbs forever, I agree its important, but doesn't always come firstand what was your point in the first place? even tho my back is maintaining a strong arch its still being used when I deadlift 500, so your first response was wrong, I need my extremely buff lower back to deadlift 500lbs good form or not, it does indeed have something to do with your erector spinaecome at me bro Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Konah 0 Posted December 3, 2010 anyone who sits around focusing on form their entire lifting career, ends up being 155lbs forever, I agree its important, but doesn't always come firstand what was your point in the first place? even tho my back is maintaining a strong arch its still being used when I deadlift 500, so your first response was wrong, I need my extremely buff lower back to deadlift 500lbs good form or not, it does indeed have something to do with your erector spinaecome at me broThat isn't true at all, just an excuse for not performing exercises correctly. My first response was directed at you posting a picture of your back then commenting on your deadlift weight. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zachmanman 877 Posted December 3, 2010 That isn't true at all, just an excuse for not performing exercises correctly. My first response was directed at you posting a picture of your back then commenting on your deadlift weight.no maximal lift is going to be absolutely perfect, otherwise its not a maximal liftand yes, exactly, thats why it was wrong, my big erectors come from deadlifting heavy ass weight, find me a picture of a dude who deadlifts over 500 and doesnt have big erectors, you need them to deadlift alot, otherwise your back will just round over and you'll never lockout and you'll have terrible form Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LOPEZ 1750 Posted December 3, 2010 ITT: Fitness trainer and Bodybuilder bitch fighting. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Konah 0 Posted December 3, 2010 no maximal lift is going to be absolutely perfect, otherwise its not a maximal liftand yes, exactly, thats why it was wrong, my big erectors come from deadlifting heavy ass weight, find me a picture of a dude who deadlifts over 500 and doesnt have big erectors, you need them to deadlift alot, otherwise your back will just round over and you'll never lockout and you'll have terrible formRead: lockout isn't completed by your lower back, unless you are doing it wrong. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites