BlackStone 66 Posted June 7, 2011 I can't find any major cases that were involved in the establishment of the hearsay rule.... if anyone can help me find them I'd be super fucking happy.... I've been hung up on this piece of information all day trying to find it and I just can't find it anywhere.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dojima 7619 Posted June 7, 2011 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay_in_English_law#History_of_the_rule Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlackStone 66 Posted June 7, 2011 That is definitely a step in the right direction... now to see if I can find the sources they used to work off of since wikipedia is banned by my college, soon to be banned by schools in general if I've read correctly from the newsletters. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlackStone 66 Posted June 7, 2011 Double post of great Justice!Thanks Dojima, that gave me enough information to bridge a couple gaps and find what I needed. You rock! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fruggles 23 Posted June 7, 2011 Wikipedia is banned by my college, soon to be banned by schools in general if I've read correctly from the newsletters.So dumb...let's talk about censorship, not to mention the pooling of informational resources/knowledge... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlackStone 66 Posted June 7, 2011 So dumb...let's talk about censorship, not to mention the pooling of informational resources/knowledge... .... No, its because wikipedia is easily edited by a large portion of users and as such cannot be reliable as a credible resource Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lesbian Dad 555 Posted June 7, 2011 .... No, its because wikipedia is easily edited by a large portion of users and as such cannot be reliable as a credible resourcesimple solution: just back check wikipedias sources. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fruggles 23 Posted June 7, 2011 .... No, its because wikipedia is easily edited by a large portion of users and as such cannot be reliable as a credible resourcebut it's a reliable way of finding informationI was a pretty involved wikipedia editor for ~1.5 years (until I went outside...), and I know that when stuff gets changed (improperly), it is very often fixed within 10 mins, and for sure within the hour - that's more true today than ever with the large number of editors, and the editors of which I speak are the ones that have the ability to lock topics from being erroneously edited...it's a pretty good system.But as far as we're talking, as a source, it should never be used - it's not a source, never claimed to be, but when you say "banned" it makes me think your school doesn't allow its use, and has it blocked from the interwebz...extreme visualization? ya. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlackStone 66 Posted June 7, 2011 O, you're just taking it a step farther then what it should be taken lol Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
