Jump to content

Tortoise

Veteran
  • Content Count

    2381
  • Donations

    125.00 USD 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    21

Tortoise last won the day on January 8 2016

Tortoise had the most liked content!

About Tortoise

  • Rank
    Cunt Destroyer
  • Birthday 10/21/1988

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

11683 profile views
  1. so are we actually going back to the old system? I'm honestly conflicted on the whole thing. Voting on new recruits was always a thing I enjoyed doing while I was still very active in the community. It made me feel like even as just an L1, it mattered what I thought of a specific person and if that person was a good fit for the community. That being said, the new system of essentially "yes" votes in the form of referrals is not a bad system, given that 30 is needed besides 3 staff. I honestly think that staff requirements should be doubled, but that's not the discussion. 30 referrals is, at least I think, a better system, because it prevents shitheads from vote-bombing someones app just because they wanted to be a cunt, and puts a bit of work on the recruit to go and make a positive impression on members. Case in point is a recent app i was looking at earlier. the guy is banned now, but no one wanted to ref him. Dude was a cunt, and he was summarily denied entry into the community. I'm certain he would have been denied in voting as well, but that's not really the point, nor was it necessary. I certainly agree with Rayne's OP that the community involvement on the forums has died away considerably, so maybe bringing back recruitment voting will boost forum usage, but I don't believe it is necessary in a recruitment standpoint. Either way, that's how I feel on the situation.
×
×
  • Create New...